| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
koen.govers
Posts: 81
|
Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2007 11:45 am Post subject: Fuel system fans linked with cooling? |
|
|
Cooling and ventilation are seperate in my project, but somehow they are linked in DB.
I'll explain;
- DB simulation gives me an annual 10kWh/mē fuel for system fans with cooling.
- if I turn off cooling its reduced to 3kWh/mē, all others (heating, room electr., etc) remain the same
- I've tested with higher setpoints for cooling and it resulted in lower energy needed for the system fan.
Is there a way to prevent DB for adjusting the ventilation.
(I've also simulated a week's hourly air flow, and there was no difference between the case with and without cooling) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Laurent_Support
Posts: 292 Location: Vincennes |
Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2007 12:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hello,
Well, I don't know your settings, so excuse me to ask you these questions.
- are you using VAV ?
- is fan are continuous or cycling ?
- do you use a central AHU or unitary system ?
Thank you,
Laurent |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
koen.govers
Posts: 81
|
Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2007 1:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thx for the quick reply.
Here is some additional info:
- fan is continuous
- 1-unitary zone, so no VAV |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
koen.govers
Posts: 81
|
Posted: Fri Dec 14, 2007 11:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ive also tested it with multi-unitary zone, and it gives the same results.
Somehow ventilation energy is consumed for cooling, but can't find how to make them seperate.
Lighting consumes 25kWh/mē, heating 11kWh/mē. So the 10 kWh/mē seems to high.
I figure the 3 kWh/mē will be more realistic... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Andy Tindale

Posts: 2432 Location: Stroud |
Posted: Sat Dec 15, 2007 5:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Fan energy is related to required airflow rates which in turn is related to cooling loads etc. Are you using economisers? If so you may get extra free cooling flow rates in summer which will add to fan loads and reduce chiller loads. I'll check this next week.
If this doesn't help please send your model.
Andy |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
koen.govers
Posts: 81
|
Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2007 9:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
Again thx for the reply,
Economizers are not set in the project...
When trying to get more output we realized the problem is bigger than expected:
- the ventilation fans work 7/7d and 24/24 (hour simulation data) when they are supposed to work in the workweek 8:18h and to be switched off otherwise.
- heat recovery does not seem to work at all, except for a small amount in summer days where there has been heating and cooling in the same day.
The combination of the previous 2 points makes the losses through mechanical ventilation too high. Static and dynamic simulation results predict a +- 40kW installation needed for total zone healing and cooling, which comes to a 70kW/mē. Too high for the low-energy concept weve created with low U-values etc.
Ive sent the model now, along with all possible data. Hopefully this clears the road. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Andy Tindale

Posts: 2432 Location: Stroud |
Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2007 12:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The connection between cooling and ventilation with unitary systems is that the max supply flow rate is based on max cooling loads. If the cooling set point is lower then the max load is lower and so the max supply flow rate is lower too. If cooling is switched off then the supply flow rate is sized to supply just fresh air.
Use the system availability schedule to control the fan (and heating/cooling availability) operation.
I'm still looking into heat recovery.
Andy |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Andy Tindale

Posts: 2432 Location: Stroud |
Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2007 2:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Initial investigations have shown that for Unitary systems with the economisor switched off, heat recovery is only possible during cooling operation (return air temperature colder than outside air temperature). It seems that you must switch the economisor on to obtain heat recovery during heating periods. Be aware however that switching the economisors on will affect outside airflow rates.
I've requested more information from EnergyPlus support on this and will let you know when I hear back from them. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Andy Tindale

Posts: 2432 Location: Stroud |
Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 5:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Following consultatiom with E+ support we have made a fix which will allow you to model heat recovery correctly in unitary single zone systems in v.1.4.0.43 and later.
| Mike Witte wrote: | | Compact HVAC uses the economizer lower temperature limit as a heating setpoint for the heat recovery unit. If the limit is blank (as it appears it was in this case), then it defaults to 5C. So, you will not get any heat recovery for heating when the ODB is >=5C. Below 5C, the heat recovery unit will only heat up the incoming air to 5C. This can be fixed by entering a higher value for the economizer lower temp limit (in the Compact HVAC object). OR, in the file you sent, change the setpoint schedules in the two SET POINT MANAGER:SCHEDULED objects. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
koen.govers
Posts: 81
|
Posted: Mon Dec 24, 2007 12:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The heating setpoint temperature for heat recovery is a great new feature.
Thanks for the help,
Hans |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|