Adiabatic surfaces

dnors · Posts: 1

I am modeling a typical office embedded in a much larger building so will deploy adiabatic surfaces to keep the thermal modeling focused. I see two options: 1. In the office model itself I can identify perimeter partitions as adiabatic or 2. I can add component blocks and identify them as adiabatic. Do these different modeling strategies deliver different results? Is one more appropriate than the other in my case?

Thanks

dnors

AOG · Posts: 163

Hi,

The only difference could be about modeling time consumption.

Regards,

Arturo

Shortcuts

Login